S

Sardine

San Francisco-built AI-native fraud, AML and credit-risk platform for global fintech — founded 2020 by ex-Coinbase / Revolut / Uber risk leaders, $145M raised, used in 150+ countries

Fraud / AML / Risk 4.5 / 5 (1 Rating) Custom enterprise pricing Updated May 2026 🌍 Global tool, US billing

Quick Verdict

Sardine is one of the most credible AI-native fraud-prevention and compliance platforms globally — founded in 2020 in San Francisco by Soups Ranjan (CEO, formerly Director of Data Science & Risk at Coinbase), Aditya Goel (ex-Revolut, ex-Uber), and Zahid Shaikh (ex-PayPal). Sardine raised a $70M Series C in February 2025 led by Activant Capital with Andreessen Horowitz, Google Ventures, Nyca, Geodesic, Moody's Analytics, Experian Ventures and others — bringing total funding to ~$145M. The product combines device intelligence, behavioural biometrics, and machine learning into a real-time fraud / AML / credit-risk decisioning surface, and 300+ enterprise customers worldwide use it including FIS, Ascensus, Deel, GoDaddy, X (Twitter) and a long tail of crypto exchanges and neobanks. For Indian product teams, the right framing is: Sardine is the right tool when your fraud problem has global, cross-border or crypto-exposed shape — Indian fintechs serving offshore customers, crypto exchanges, B2B cross-border payments. For India-domestic fraud problems built around Aadhaar, UPI and CIBIL, you'll typically pair an Indian-stack vendor (HyperVerge for video KYC, IDfy or Karza for identity-data, Sift / Forter for general fraud) with Sardine layered on top of the global / crypto surface — or skip Sardine entirely for purely India-domestic flows.

Behavioural biometrics
4.8
Device intelligence
4.7
Crypto / global fraud coverage
4.6
India-domestic data sources
2.5
India support & billing
3.0

What is Sardine?

Sardine is an AI-native fraud-prevention, AML / sanctions-compliance and credit-risk platform aimed at fintechs, neobanks, payment processors, marketplaces and crypto businesses. The product surface is a real-time risk-decisioning layer that ingests a rich set of signals — device fingerprint, behavioural biometrics (typing rhythm, mouse movement, gesture patterns), IP & geo, transaction context, identity-document signals, plus consortium data shared across customers — and runs them through Sardine's machine-learning models to score each event for fraud, money-laundering or credit risk, in milliseconds, with a configurable rules layer on top.

The company was founded in 2020 in San Francisco by three founders with deep risk-and-compliance backgrounds: Soups Ranjan (CEO) was previously Coinbase's Director of Data Science and Risk, where he built much of Coinbase's early fraud-detection infrastructure. Aditya Goel (Head of Payment Products) came from Revolut and Uber, and Zahid Shaikh (Head of Risk Products) from PayPal. The founding-team thesis was simple: traditional fraud platforms (LexisNexis, Experian, FICO) were built for a banking world where most fraud had a paper trail; the new world — instant onboarding, crypto, cross-border B2B — needed a real-time, ML-first risk platform that didn't depend on bureau pulls.

Funding history: Seed in 2020, Series A in 2021, $51.5M Series B in September 2022 led by Andreessen Horowitz, and a $70M Series C in February 2025 led by Activant Capital — bringing total funding to roughly $145M. The Series C explicitly funded an investment in agentic AI — Sardine is building autonomous-agent workflows that can review fraud cases, run KYC investigations and execute compliance tasks with reduced human-analyst time. This is the company's strategic direction through 2026.

For Indian product teams, the most important positioning point is that Sardine is fundamentally a global fraud platform, with depth in cross-border and crypto risk. It is widely used by Indian-founded global fintechs (cross-border B2B payment companies, Indian crypto exchanges that serve global customers, US-incorporated Indian-founder fintechs targeting US end-users). It is less commonly used as the primary fraud platform for India-domestic UPI / Aadhaar-based fintechs — for that, the coverage of Indian-specific data sources (CIBIL, Aadhaar mismatch signals, UPI VPA reputation) is genuinely better at Indian-built vendors.

Capabilities

👆 Behavioural biometrics

Typing rhythm, mouse movement, scroll patterns, touch gestures, copy-paste behaviour. Used to distinguish human users from bots, and known users from account-takeover attempts. Among the deepest behavioural signal stacks in commercial software.

📱 Device intelligence

Device fingerprinting, browser signals, emulator / virtual-machine detection, jailbreak / root detection, app-tampering signals. Real-time signal generation at the page-render or app-launch step; integrates via JavaScript SDK or native mobile SDKs.

🛡️ Real-time fraud decisioning

ML-scored decisions on application, login, payment and high-risk action events — sub-100ms latency. Configurable rules layer for compliance teams to override or augment ML scores. Supports A/B testing of risk rules, which is unusual in this category.

🚨 AML & sanctions screening

Real-time screening against OFAC, EU, UN, India RBI, and other sanctions lists, plus PEP screening, adverse-media screening and crypto-wallet risk scoring. Case-management workflow for compliance team review.

🪙 Crypto-specific risk

Wallet-address risk scoring, on-chain transaction analysis, mixer / tornado-cash exposure, and integration with Chainalysis / TRM Labs. The deepest crypto-fraud surface among general fraud platforms — driven by the team's Coinbase background.

🤖 Agentic AI workflows (2025+)

Newer surface: autonomous-agent workflows that review fraud cases, conduct KYC investigations, draft Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) and execute escalation logic. The flagship investment area for the post-Series C product roadmap.

Pricing & plans (2026)

Sardine does not publish list prices. Real-world contracts in 2025–2026 typically land in the $30K–$200K+ per year range depending on transaction volume, which surfaces (fraud only vs fraud + AML + crypto) you license, and whether the Sardine team handles the implementation. For Indian buyers that translates to roughly ₹25L–₹1.7Cr+ per year all-in, with USD invoicing and 18% IGST. The page's previous "₹3,00,000+/year typical" figure (~$3.5K) was an order of magnitude too low for actual enterprise contracts; we've corrected it. Sardine also charges per-API-call fees on top of the platform fee for high-volume customers — typically a few cents per scored event. Always validate via a quote on sardine.ai.

When Sardine is the right call (for Indian buyers)

  1. You're a cross-border or global fintech — Indian-founder companies serving US, EU or other-international customers; cross-border B2B payments; international remittance. Sardine's global coverage and consortium data become genuinely valuable.
  2. You're a crypto exchange or wallet — Sardine's crypto-specific risk surface is one of the best in commercial software. Indian crypto exchanges with global user bases use it extensively.
  3. You're seeing sophisticated fraud (account takeover, behavioural anomalies, bots) — Sardine's behavioural-biometrics + device-intelligence stack is the right tool for these patterns, regardless of geography.
  4. You're investing in agentic-AI compliance workflows — Sardine is meaningfully ahead on this surface vs traditional fraud platforms.

Sardine is the wrong call when: you're a domestic Indian fintech where most of your fraud is rooted in Aadhaar/UPI/CIBIL data — use HyperVerge, IDfy or Karza as the primary stack and only consider Sardine as a behavioural-biometrics layer on top. Sardine is also the wrong call for very early-stage startups that need a fraud tool live this week — sales cycles are enterprise-paced.

Pros & cons

✓ Pros

  • Deep behavioural biometrics + device intelligence — among the best in commercial software
  • Strong crypto-specific risk surface (Chainalysis / TRM Labs integration, on-chain analysis)
  • Real-time decisioning with sub-100ms latency at scale
  • Founder pedigree — ex-Coinbase / Revolut / Uber / PayPal risk leadership
  • Strong investor backing (a16z, Activant, Google Ventures, Moody's, Experian Ventures)
  • Active investment in agentic-AI compliance workflows (post Series C, 2025)

✗ Cons

  • Not deeply integrated with India-specific data sources (CIBIL, Aadhaar mismatch signals, UPI VPA reputation)
  • USD billing + 18% IGST for Indian buyers
  • India support routed through US team — no IST-aligned local presence
  • Pricing is opaque — no public price card; sales-led only
  • Overkill for purely India-domestic fraud problems

Related insights & playbooks